|
Session VIII
e-Governance: past, present and future
The panel advised attendees to learn from the past and apply
learnings from it for greater success in e-Governance projects.
The
Indian e-governance story began with a vision of redefining the scope of the
relationship between the citizens of India and its government. It was, is and
will continue to be about the use of IT and communication technologies, to deliver
public services in a convenient, customer-centric and cost-effective manner.
However, it is easier said than done for there exist process related challenges
and sociopolitical bottlenecks that are preventing the Indian e-Governance story
from realizing its full potential. Therefore, it was fitting that in what was
the last session of the Technology Sabha 2009, another panel discussion was
held entitled e-Governance: Past, Present and Future.
The panel comprised of Shankar Aggarwal, Joint Secretary, Ministry of IT and
Prof. Subhash Bhatnagar of IIM-Ahmedabad, while Kailash Shirodkar, BPD moderated
the discussion.
Prof. Bhatnagar began by outlining some key problems facing the e-governance
initiatives in the country. He noted that despite its best intentions a basic
flaw exists in the governments strategy i.e. strategic inclusion of the
entire population and not just the masses residing in the metros, smaller towns
and semi-rural areas. They keep talking about extending services to the
far corners of the country right down to the last village, but it is not reflected
in the kind of applications being rolled out by state and federal governments.
For instance hardly anything is being done in the case of health and education,
services affect virtually every citizen of this country, he said.
Limited access to what many in metros and smaller town may now consider basic
technologies such as the Internet are not available to the masses in rural areas.
Hence, despite having systems for facilitating electronic transactions, people
still have to make trips to their local center, which more often than not is
plagued with infrastructural issues. He alluded to how a true e-governance system
by definition requires the least amount of human intervention where decisions
on cases are system-driven rather than by individuals.
Concurring with Bhatnagar, Shankar Aggarwal from the Ministry of IT took the
argument a step further and emphasized the fact the going forward the government
will pursue services and develop applications that affect the public a lot more.
He recommended that state agencies devise applications such as medical healthcare,
employment and education. Services related to such areas will go a long
way in ensuring the sustainability of e-Governance initiatives, Aggarwal
said.
Commenting on the issue of lack of political will preventing e-governance initiatives
from reaching their full potential, Aggarwal said that imputing the political
order would be unfair as there exists greater political will to implement e-governance
than ever before and the problem comes back to the issue of services and choosing
the right applications.
The panelists spent quite a bit of time on the issue of the political order
and its impact on e-governance. They even debated on the issue of why some states
have done well in terms of offering services and citizen interest and some have
not and if it had anything to do with the political order in the respective
states.
Around midway, the discussion began digressing towards bureaucratic rigmarole
and how IT and e-Governance issues tend to get sidelined as a result. However,
pretty soon it was brought back on track and Aggarwal referred to the projects
such as DGS&D and MCA-21, one of the largest e-Governance initiatives and
how the success of these projects will continue to fuel the interest of the
government as well as the bureaucratic machinery.
In conclusion, Prof. Bhatnagar, called upon those in-charge of affairs to continuously
learn from successful projects of the past and even the failures and innovate
new designs for rolling out future services. He summed up the apt approach for
e-Governance in the country through a simple yet apt quote. He said, We
need a good balance between optimism for the future but recognition that not
everything is hunky-dory in the present.
|