|
Feature
Using social networking sites for hiring
Social networking sites are a good tool to tap passive candidates
who are not actively looking for a job opportunity, writes Vinita Gupta
The
growth of social networking sites is getting wider; as of February 2008, LinkedIn
had more than 19 million registered users, spanning across 150 industries. These
sites, especially the business-oriented social networking sites, provide instant
credibility to a professionals profile, with the referrals and recommendations
of the person, thus aiding recruiters in captivating their mindshare. Thus,
today many job seekers and recruiters in India are making use of sites such
as LinkedIn, Facebook, Orkut, Big Adda, Hi5, Brijj, Yaari, Fropper, Ryze, Xing,
etc., to identify the right and potential candidates, including international
talent, at minimal cost.
Advantage for recruiters
|
"Very
few senior employees are using social networking sites; it is mostly accessed
by the younger generation and hence it is beneficial for the IT/ BPO companies
as they are usually in search of young talent"
- Rajaram Agarwal
Managing Director of TalentAhead India
|
For recruiters, social networking sites come to the rescue
when one is looking out for candidates having niche skills or for roles based
in alien geographies. For instance, if an IT services firm wants to hire a regional
head for its Media and Entertainment business based in Boston, it wont
find much value in uploading this position on job sites and thats where
networking sites come into play when one is looking for candidates for roles
based in far-off places.
India is one of LinkedIns largest and fastest-growing
countries, and recruitment plays a big role in that. Social networking sites
are quite useful on a global basis. I heard of one Indian company which used
LinkedIn to target candidates in Singapore who might be interested in coming
back to India for senior level roles, said Elisabeth ODonnell, International
Director, LinkedIn.
Navin Mittal, Business Head, Fropper.com, mentioned that social networking sites
are also about professional or business networking. Sites like linkedin.com
and ryze.com are dedicated to business networking, where people put up their
professional details and get an opportunity to interact with other professionals.
Such sites become a breeding ground from which recruiters can select the best
of the pack.
Social networking sites vs job sites
Are social networking sites more effective than job sites? Vishal Taneja, Senior
Consultant at Redileon believed that networking sites as well as job sites cater
to different spectrum of skills and levels. Both have well defined and seemingly
well demarcated (by design) user defined solutions and hence effectiveness of
one over the other cannot be generalized. He felt that credibility is the key
benefit of a social networking site, as users are able to view public endorsements
by former colleagues and business partners, which are available on the persons
profile.
But Rajaram Agarwal, MD of TalentAhead India, disagreed with
it as he felt that credibility is same for job sites and social networking sites
and hence they make sure to do credibility check of the person. According to
him, social networking sites can be used by recruitment agencies as people who
are not very active job seekers can be contacted and offered job proposals,
since these people usually dont put up their CV on job sites. But he agreed
that getting senior and experienced people through these sites is quite difficult.
He added, Very few senior employees are using social networking sites;
it is mostly accessed by the younger generation and hence it is beneficial for
the IT/ BPO companies as they are usually in search of young talent. But tools
such as job preference, location required, etc. that are available on job sites
are not available at the networking sites. TalentAhead India first looks
at the persons profile present on these networking sites and if it matches
the job requirement, they mail the job offer to the person.
|
"The
fact is that many people are not active on the job market; therefore
they arent proactively visiting jobs boards. Hence much hiring is
done through a network of referrals, job portals cannot fulfill all of
the needs in the hiring process"
- Elisabeth ODonnell
International Director, LinkedIn
|
"Social
networking sites would be a key differentiator in the recruitment market.
All corporates can pay a subscription fee and get access to Naukri, JobsAhead
or Monster to access the candidate database. The ability to tap passive
job seekers through the Internet is a skill and would be a key differentiator
in the coming years"
- Rajesh A R
Vice-president, TeamLease Services
|
Rajesh A R, Vice-president, TeamLease Services stated, In the long run,
social networking sites would be a key differentiator in the recruitment market.
All corporates can pay a subscription fee and get access to Naukri, JobsAhead
or Monster to access the candidate database. The ability to tap passive job
seekers through the Internet is a skill and would be a key differentiator in
the coming years.
According to Rajesh, there are lots of open e-groups for various interest levels
like mountaineering, supply chain management, cycling, etc. Most of the members
in these e-groups are working executives with more than three-four years of
experience and would not have posted their CVs in job portals. He added,
As we are present in these e-groups as silent spectators, we get to know
about these candidates. For example, if the recruiters are looking for admin
executives, they might log into e-groups group of people in the domain of facilitiesadmin.
They can also go through blog sites to understand the various profiles and interest
areas of the candidates.
Most job sites will have a larger quantity of jobs posted
than a site like LinkedIn does. However, in terms of the size of the candidate
pool, and the contextual information that a recruiter can find out about a candidate,
and vice-versa, social networking sites are definitely better on this front,
mentioned ODonnell. She said, The fact is that many people are not
active on the job market; therefore they arent proactively visiting jobs
boards. Hence much hiring is done through a network of referrals, job portals
cannot fulfill all of the needs in the hiring process.
|
|
Advantages
- Wider reach as large number of people
post their profiles online
- Ability to identify both active (job portals)
and passive (social networking sites) job seekers
- Attains significant cost reduction
- Assesses the candidates to greater extent
like behavioral attributes, as individuals tend to open up more in their
social network
- Reach out to candidates with niche skills
- Access to different international talent
pools
- Provides instant credibility to a professionals
profile with the referrals and recommendations on the person
Disadvantages
- Job portal search can yield immediate results, but passive headhunting
through social networking sites can be time consuming till sourcing
patterns are identified
- Pointed searches either not possible or do not yield accurate results
|
Direct hiring by companies
Hiring is a very important decision for both the company and the candidate,
and it involves a large degree of trust on both sides. Even before the advent
of online, referrals played a large role in the hiring process but the companies
HR department making direct use of these sites for hiring people is still at
the nascent stage.
Searching blogs or social networking sites can be time consuming and may
not yield the ROI in a shorter time frame. As we invest time and resources,
we would be able to identify patterns to tap passive candidates who fit into
the requirement. Like any other profession, e-sourcing requires considerable
skill set. This is one of the reasons the acceptance levels would be slow among
corporates or small-time recruiters, mentioned Rajesh.
But ODonnell said, Many of our corporate customers use LinkedIn
precisely for that. Companies like Oracle, SAP, and Microsoft are some of our
largest customers, and they largely use LinkedIn for their HR and recruiting
functions; other functions that subscribe to LinkedIn are sales and business
development. If you look at the jobs listed on LinkedIn for India, you will
see companies like Sapient, Electronic Arts, and Wipro posting vacancies. Additionally,
many companies purchase subscriptions on LinkedIn to source candidates who are
not necessarily looking at jobs boards.
Some of the HR consultants and HR managers have started checking out candidates
profiles on Orkut, which is in line with the international trend followed on
MySpace, etc.. There are also large communities of corporate companies which
give access to information on people working in the same organization, even
their discussions, etc., revealed Puneet Johar, MD, Tangerine Digital Entertainment
Campus18.com.
Satya Prabhakar, CEO of Sulekha.com said, Many companies succeed by looking
for future employees on social networking sites. HR managers feel that the quality
of response is good and helps create a good database of candidates to be tapped
subsequently. Easy accessibility to the service, plus the market pull that India
holds right now on the international community means that it is feasible to
use the service for hiring. Corporate alumni networks can be a powerful tool
for recruitment and even brand building.
Candidates can include keywords and descriptions about themselves that will
enable their profile to be easily accessed when recruiters and hiring managers
search for a specific skill on these sites. Thus, online social networking sites
are an another platform to find the right fit for job seekers and recruiters
and it seems beneficial to allthe recruitment agencies, companies, candidates
and not to forget the sites themselves.
vinita.gupta@expressindia.com
|