|
Manage-Wise
Face reality and tackle your vulnerabilities
It
is very hard for people who have enjoyed success to face reality and accept
the fact that certain things they do could be significantly improved. It goes
against their pride and their self-image. One of the most important things an
individual or an organization can do is to develop a mindset that constantly
assumes that things can be improved and aggressively pursues alternatives. Here
are some good steps to follow to figure out where things stand:
Review all aspects of your business model. For each component, ask what the
best players are doing and whether you have an advantage. If you have been doing
things the same way for a long period in a particular area, force yourself to
investigate alternatives thoroughly. This is the kind of exercise that typically
never happens. People get so busy executing day-to-day activities that they
rarely take time to step back and look at the big picture.
Be objective. This is the hard part. People who have experienced success and
are experts in their legacy practices see things through very biased eyes. It
takes energy and hard work to start with a clean piece of paper and create new
approaches to things that you have become accustomed to doing in a certain way.
Case study
Lets look at an example of an industrial giant that
was almost driven out of business because it couldnt see that it had become
completely out of sync with its customers.
In the early 1990s, IBM was an example of a previously successful company whose
top managers were simply not realistic. They were clinging to the ways in which
IBM had operated for years, and they could not imagine any viable alternatives.
When the board increased the pressure on the companys managers, they claimed
that there was no better way to run the place and suggested that the company
might as well be broken up into numerous smaller companies. But they never developed
a specific plan to do so that looked compelling. The board of directors ran
out of patience and hired a new CEO.
When Lou Gerstner became the CEO of IBM in 1993, he ran into some incredibly
entrenched legacy practices. While Gerstner describes these in detail in his
book Who Says Elephants Cant Dance? There are a few that are so classic
that I want to point them out here.
The first thing that infuriated Lou was IBMs process of strategic decision-making,
which consisted of groups within the company forwarding proposals to the Management
Committee, often referred to as the MC. When Lou joined the company, there were
six members of the MC, and it met once or twice a week, typically in a very
formal, long meeting with lots of presentations. Being a member of the MC was
the ultimate position of power that every IBM executive aspired to. Every major
decision in the company was made by MC.
The difficulty with this decision-making process was that
over the years, IBM people had learned how to manipulate the system to get issues
handled. Anything that was going to be truly contentious was worked out among
the various groups in IBM to finally reach a compromise consensus. The consensus
proposal, which reflected these compromises, was forwarded to the MC for presentation,
discussion, and final decision. By the time the MC got a proposal, however,
there really wasnt much to discuss because the compromises needed to appease
possible dissenters had already been made. Unfortunately, such compromising
also dilutes the impact.
Lou hated this watering-down process. He believed that the industry was moving
so fast and the technology was so complex that risks had to be taken. A committee
process based on compromise was no way to generate big, distinctive, disruptive
ideas that could have a big payoff for IBM.
The second thing that was driving Lou nuts was IBMs
complex financial management process. The difficulty was that each group in
the complex matrix of geographical units and product divisions had its own set
of financial systems and budgets.
It was extremely difficult to pull together consolidated financial statements
for all of IBM. Allocations were changing all the time, and accountability was
almost completely absent. All of this made it very difficult to find out the
real status of various projects and, most importantly, to set specific goals
and hold people responsible for achieving them.
The third area where Lou uncovered flaws in the business
model was how confusing IBM was from a customer perspective. IBMs product
activities were fragmented, and the sales organization was very complex and
internally focused, causing customers to be confused about how to deal with
IBM. Customers were very disappointed by IBMs lack of responsiveness,
undoubtedly because of this organizational complexity.
Making fundamental changes
Given all these problems, Lou had to make some very fundamental changes in the
company. He knew he had to clean up the complexity and point the entire organization
in a specific direction that would get it focused and lead to success.
Within six months of his arrival, he announced to all IBM employees via email
that their new role in life would be to solve the customers information
technology (IT)- related business needs. Basically, his mission was to transform
IBM from a computer company to a much broader technology and services company.
He totally reorganized the company around customers, and he made a huge push
to increase IBMs services revenue.
All of this involved some very tough decisions, such as massive layoffs, the
sale of some operations, and the closing down of several manufacturing plants,
many projects, and several offices. The prior business model had become massively
bloated, fragmented, lethargic, and crammed full of legacy practices.
Once Lou decided on the direction in which to take the company, he used every
opportunity to make sure that the industry, and IBM employees, knew what to
expect from the company in the future.
Excerpt from Seduced by Success by Robert J
Herbold. Reproduced with permission © 2007, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing
Company Limited. Price: Rs 450. Vishwanath_Ghanekar@mcgraw-hill.com
|