|
Manage-Wise
Master of constant change
Change
yourself and change your organisationconstantly. These are the twin challenges
of our corporate times. Executives must change themselves. They must develop
new skills to make themselves more employable and to keep up with the heady
pace of development.
Corporations must also change. The static organisation is
on its way to the corporate graveyard.
Jack Welch has proved himself a master of both personal and
corporate change. Welch never sits still and created an organisation that does
likewise.
Mr Welch can spend a day visiting a factory, jump on
a plane, catch a few hours sleep, and start all over again; in between, he might
stop in Sun Alley, Idaho, and as he puts it, ski like crazy for
five days, noted an article in The Wall Street Journal.
Leaders are energetic. They have to be. Margaret Thatcher
slept four hours a night and rose to pore over yet more government papers. IBMs
Lou Gerstner is renowned for his energy (and sleep) levels. Top executives travel
constantly and yet still emerge from the arrivals lounge looking fresh, armed
with a report they have just written somewhere over the ocean. David Campbell
of the Center for Creative Leadership finds over and over that effective leaders
and high energy go hand in hand on his leadership inventory.
Maximising energy
Energy is a prerequisite for the top job. The mistake is
to think that Welchs secret is quantity rather than quality. Maximising
energy is much more than running fast or working harder. Anyone can work 16
hours a day. The world is full of hard working executives who have mortgaged
their future health and family life against their current working day. But,
how you spend your time, how you enthuse others is more important.
Quality is vital; quantity is no longer a competitive advantage.
In fact, executives who pin their faith simply on working harder are taking
a route to burnout and disenchantment.
The truth is that maximising effectiveness is more important
than maximising working hours. Research by Phil Hodgson of Ashridge Management
College estimated that conventional managers probably operate to just 40 percent
of their true ability. They spend 10 percent of their time being really effective
by doing what is important and 30 percent of their time gaining credibility
in order to be really effective for that other 10 percent. The rest of the time
they spend doing things that are not important, or dont produce the outcome
they want. Do the important things more often and more intensively and you will
be working smart.
Working smart, Jack Welch style, has a number of features:
Everyday is different. Everyday is a challenge. Who runs out of ideas?
asks Welch. If you never had another idea, you might as well quit your
job. Every day we wake up, theres another basket of opportunities. When
you are $70 billion company, you are doing so many things wrong that the amount
available for improvement is literally infinite.
Our improvements are getting greater with time, not diminishing.
Such relentless positivism insists that things can be sorted out, improved,
solved. And it works.
Peel away the layers. Reverse engineer. Leaders have to dig
deep, and deeper and deeper still.
They must peel away the layers. Executives must look for problems
to solve. And then there is another
problem, and another. Welch is an engineer by training and the urge to ask questions
and figure out what is really happening has never left him.
They are not angelic figures who regard financial rewards
as unimportant. They expect to be well rewarded, but look beyond the narrow
motivation of money alone.
Get a life. I spend enough hours to get the job done,
Welch once said. He is not one of those macho execs who constantly refers to
working 23 hours a day and sleeping for five nanoseconds. (Of course, the fact
that he does not say it repeatedly does not mean that he doesnt work long
hours. Its just not a big deal).
Jack Welch, strange as it may seem, had a life outside GE.
It was a fairly ordinary life. For such a powerful and wealthy man it was a
very quiet life. Living opposite a golf club ensured that the first tee was
never far away. He didnt fill his few spare hours with non-executive directorships
or other peripheral stuff. He enjoyed getting his handicap down and recharging.
Smart.
Learn and change
Not only did Jack Welch work smart: he developed smart. His
career has missed out the stagnancy of middle age. He has kept on learning,
adding to his formidable battery of skills. He has changed and then changed
some more. In doing so he has defied a commonplace pattern.
Look at how our careers develop. In the first place, we watch
the corporate video or attend an induction programme to know the basics of what
is expected of us: the corporate values and behaviour. Then, we go up through
the first level of performance and are taught the essential things to survive
and prosper in that businessperhaps it is selling, perhaps it is computing,
perhaps it is accounting. Whatever it is we are given the basic rules. Master
marketing and you will progress. Good financiers get to the top here.
Then, if we are very good, we move into a second layer where
we can start to adapt some of the things we have been taught to local circumstances.
But, it we come up against something we really dont know, our best way
of dealing with it is to go and ask someone who does know to help us enhance
our knowledge.
During this process, the developing executive is highly conscious
of his or her vulnerability. As we have seen, learning involves taking a risk
and taking risks makes us vulnerable. People are afraid to make themselves more
vulnerable, to expose themselves to potential loss of face, loss of opportunity
or simply loss.
As a result, the executives develop what has been accurately
labeled as a myth of mastery. By steering clear of trouble spots, situations
that make them vulnerable, executives begin to believe that they are invincible.
In their own minds that are, in Tom Wolfes phrase, Masters of the
Universe.
In turn, this provides a formula for executive progression.
The people who reach the top are high performers who dont make mistakes.
They get it right, but sacrifice things to get it right. They are often better
at a particular skill than the people who work for them. They are perfectionists
with high IQs who dont tolerate dips in performance. They are also superstitiousbelieving
that if they do what they have always done, things will come right.
As an adjunct to the myth of mastery, executives are often
promoted because they are good technically, not because they are good with people.
Excerpt from Business the Jack Welch Way by
Stuart Crainer. Published by Wiley India
|