|
DR/BC
Needed: Continuity
Demand for continuity varies according to business requirements
and hence it is affecting the DR/BC policies of medium businesses. By Kushal
Shah
We
live in a world of absolute uncertainty with the risk of losing everything we
have in no time at all. Disasters can well make that risk a reality. In last
five years we have probably seen more disasters than in the last five decades.
Disasters can occur in any form; be it a natural disaster such as earthquake,
floods or a hurricane or a man made situation such as theft or fire, virus attack;
all of which result in immense damage to property and other assets.
Imagine the situation of a company which runs a real-time critical operation
whose data centre gets washed out in a flood-like situation. All the branches
of that organisation across the country come to a standstill with losses ranging
way beyond the imagination. Losses are inevitable in case of a disaster, what
is required is a way to minimise these losses. Organisations need a well structured
disaster recovery policy through which they can resume business in no time at
all.
The medium segment of Indian enterprises is a little bit better in terms of
DR and BC policies. It lacks proper implementation even though critical operations
running across the country are not uncommon. According to the survey, only 27
percent of organisations had their DR and BC plans in place. It is not about
maintaining the continuity of business at a single office; these companies all
have multiple branches in India which need business continuity. An average of
13 branches in India, most of them interconnected usually have a single point
of failure. A disastrous situation at the headquarters or main server will result
in zero business. Maintaining a hot or a cold site seemed out of the reach of
these organisations which lack hefty budgets for such processes. Rather than
spending millions on DR/BC processes which doesnt yield much value for
these organisations, they can go in for various other policies which can enable
them continue their business after any event or it should be such that the downtime
faced by them is minimal.
For such organised implementation, all they need is proper understanding of
technology and the tags of benefit associated with it in terms of better ROI
and customer satisfaction.
| Level 0 |
Striped Disk Array without Fault Tolerance |
Provides data striping (spreading out
blocks of each file across multiple disk drives) but no redundancy. This
improves performance but does not deliver fault tolerance. If one drive
fails then all data in the array is lost. |
| Level 1 |
Mirroring and Duplexing |
Provides disk mirroring. Level 1 provides
twice the read transaction rate of single disks and the same write transaction
rate as single disks. |
| Level 2 |
Error-Correcting Coding |
It is not a typical implementation and
rarely used. This level stripes data at the bit level rather than the block
level. |
| Level 3 |
Bit-Interleaved Parity |
It provides byte-level striping with
a dedicated parity disk. Level 3, which cannot service simultaneous multiple
requests, also is rarely used. |
| Level 4 |
Dedicated Parity Drive |
A commonly used implementation of RAID,
Level 4 provides block-level striping (like Level 0) with a parity disk.
If a data disk fails, the parity data is used to create a replacement disk.
A disadvantage to Level 4 is that the parity disk can create write bottlenecks.
|
| Level 5 |
Block Interleaved Distributed Parity |
Provides data striping at the byte level
and also stripe error correction information. This results in excellent
performance and good fault tolerance. Level 5 is one of the most popular
implementations of RAID. |
Segmented importance
The importance of DR and BC varies from business to business. Some businesses
are data critical and some are not so dependent on data and can even work for
a few days without access to data. For such companies heavy spending on DR/BC
operations hardly serves any purpose. On the other hand, businesses such as
financial services and IT/ITES are completely dependent on data and the continuity
of business is of high importance. All have some way or the other to tackle
disasters. They have various means of backing up data and continuing to do business
in a crunch situation.
The most cautious segment which cared the most about business continuity was
IT/ITES. Almost 50 percent of the organisations in this category cared about
this issue and had a defined DR/BC policy. Many ITES companies, for whom the
business revolves around client data and providing round the clock service,
take every possible step within their reach to improve business performance.
All of these companies had well-defined recovery time objective and recovery
point objectives. Even after these policies are in place, implementations of
high end technologies and hardware are few. Most rely on disk-to-disk-to-tape
methods for maintaining data and applications. We are not at all looking
for a dedicated DR site. What we are doing is managing the organisational data
very well, says Navin Kumar, Vice President Technology, Go..IP solutions
Ltd. Apart from traditional data backups on optical media such as CD or DVD
they are using five levels of RAID for storing and securing data. According
to Kumar, it would not take more than half an hour to get business up and running
after a disaster.
Business continuity for such ITES companies should be such that even if one
of the centres or branches goes down, another office should take the load and
continue the business with minimal wastage of time. Regular drills should take
place in order to assess the process which will make the job of an IT manager
easier.
The sector which had the best security in place as far as
technologies and implementations are concerned; FMCG /Consumer Durables was
last in implementing the DR/BC policies and planning. Only 18 percent of the
organisations in this segment had taken care of these issues. Low concentration
on DR/BC policies in this segment can be because of low usage of computers for
day to day business in this sector which is evident from the fact that the average
number of computer nodes for this sector is around 75, whereas the industry
average is 361. Though the aggregate of implementations were low, whoever had
some system in place had the full knowledge of the seriousness of the topic
and had taken best possible measures to make sure that the system can recover
from any calamity. Companies such as Apeejay Surrendra Corporate Services didnt
have a cold or a hot site but they had well defined storage policies and off
site storage facilities which are being managed by a full fledged IT team of
over 50 people.
Next to the top spot taken by IT/ITES, Manufacturing/ Engineering comes second
but way behind IT/ITES. Only about 29 percent of organisations in this category
have a DR/BC plan in place. Some of them are not so data critical businesses
and some have taken serious steps towards making their business continuous at
all the times by making sure that data is safe and recoverable at all the times.
OM Logistics Ltd is even planning a dedicated DR site. On the other hand, BLA
Industries limited is taking all the steps to ensure data security and reliability
by constantly backing up the data but RTO and RPO do not serve any purpose for
them as the business can even run for two to three days without the IT infrastructure,
after all a coal mining site can certainly work without relying on computers.
Most other verticals ranged between 20 to 30 percent implementations
in terms of DR and BC planning. They all looked at DR in terms of securing and
backing up their data.
What they do
Organisations like these spend a significant amount of money on IT. The average
expenditure on IT lies in the range of Rs1.7 crores for the medium segment.
Unfortunately hardly any amount is spent on DR/BC operations. The most common
practise amongst these companys heads is that of adopting disk-to-disk-to-tape
backup policies. Most organisations have a dedicated backup server for storing
data and which in turn is archived on to external tape drives.
Real-time backup of critical data is taken on the server automatically
and with the help of scheduled operations, this data is retaken on to the tape
drives offline, explains Atul Bansal, Manager IT, BLA Industries
Limited. He adds that the data is initially taken on to the local server which
is located at the remote site and from there the local data is archived on a
weekly basis and finally the central server is updated with the help of this
data. Retrieval of this data does not take much time but they can even do without
the recovery for few days because of which they do not have any RTO or RPO.
Even if it is not so critical, they are planning to spend on a hot site in the
near future.
Almost similar process is followed by Apeejay Surrendra Corporate Services,
The data is stored in centralised storage devices. Regular archival of
the data is also a common practise for us which is done twice a week. At the
offsite location data is stored in a locker. After all these local processes,
the head office server is updated with the changes, says Jitendra Nath,
CTO, Apeejay Surrendra Corporate Services Pvt. Ltd.
Jagsonpal Pharmaceuticals Ltd backs up data with the help of optical media apart
from storing data on servers. Apart from these technologies, we make our
employees aware of the importance of backing up data and tell them to back their
data on their own on regular basis. On an organisational basis, only application
data is stored on to servers, says Prakash Pradhan, Head IT, Jagsonpal
Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
OM Logistics relies on the main server at the Delhi office for data storage
and backup and takes occasional backups to a tape library and special storage
devices. This process takes about seven to eight hours for recovery. Wagh Bakri,
a major tea provider, makes use of replication facility of the servers to copy
backed up data. The archival is done with the help of DVDs.
Some companies have no provision for organised DR/BC. Pasupati
Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd use traditional backup policies in the form of
CD and DVD backups without any IT department in place which surely poses a threat
to the data.
- As per the survey, 93 percent (156 of
167 respondents) of the medium business houses have existing connectivity
infrastructure.
- 74 percent of 156 respondents have invested
in leased lines while 56 percent have invested in DSL connectivity.
n 49 percent of 167 respondents are planning to invest in leased line
connectivity while 31 percent will invest in DSL.
- FMCG/Consumer Durables, Auto & Auto
Components and IT/ITES are the verticals planning to deploy leased lines
in the coming year.
|
Need of the hour
With number of disasters growing at the rate faster than most economies, it
is essential to make provisions to handle the worst case scenarios. Once gone,
data is gone forever; one catastrophic event can wipe out the data on your existing
system forever and if not backed up, a lot of critical information can be lost.
Organisations need to understand the criticality and the importance of their
data and need to continue doing business. All growing companies want to have
their piece of the pie in the growing economy but nothing can be achieved with
a slow paced business. One needs to work round the clock for better results
and customer satisfaction. In order to achieve this goal, one needs to put an
expert to planning for business continuity and data recovery to survive.
Organisations are spending a lot on their security, but they forget that no
security is foolproof. There is always room for some attack to take place. Once
attacked, only option left is to recover the system with the help of stored
backup and carry on with the business as usual. In case of absence of a recovery
plan, the entire organisation will grind to a halt and all the critical data
can be lost which, in turn, will affect your business since customers will churn
away to your competitors. Organisations should plan polices keeping in mind
their needs and budget, and if needed there is no harm in increasing the expenditure
on DR/BC processes and reducing less critical IT spending.
|