|
Project Log
Arjun Technologies embraces 3D
Arjun Technologies has been able to execute projects better
after making the shift from 2D to 3D CAD. This has resulted in productivity
rising, improved modelling capabilities, better visualisation and fewer errors
in drawings. S. Soundarajan, General Manager, Projects and Engineering,
Arjun Technologies talks to Abhinav Singh about the project and how it
has made a difference
The shift from a 2D to a 3D software platform has brought in significant changes
when it comes to the way in which projects are executed at Arjun Technologies.
The engineering drawing approval mechanism has been expedited and more accurate
drawings are being generated.
The trouble with 2D
We are a medium-sized engineering company supplying process plants for the
pulp and paper industries. We had been using a 2D platform for a decade and
there were many issues with it the biggest of which was that in a multi-user
environment there are chances of human errors creeping in. The designs that
we do here are inter-disciplinary including civil, architectural, piping and
mechanical design. We have executed over 30 projects in India, South Asia, South-East
Asia and the Middle East including those funded by multinational funding institutions
such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank and bilateral funding institutions
such as the Overseas Economic Cooperation Fund (OECF).
We undertake extensive design and engineering of process plants for which we
develop complete equipment and piping layouts as well as cable tray routings.
We also do component drawings for our manufacturer.
The engineering designs have to follow a sequence. For instance, if a change
has to be incorporated this has to be done in a sequence. The problem we were
facing with the 2D software was that there was no interlinking of drawing sequences
leading to a lot of human error. If a change was not incorporated in one drawing
sequence, it did not get reflected in other sequences, leading to inaccurate
production.
While working on 2D, changes needed to be incorporated and updated in every
related drawing, which was time consuming and had an effect on the completion
of our projects. It used to takes a week to incorporate any changes on a 2D
platform, slowing down the project lifecycle. As a result modifications of drawings
became time consuming as was the process of assembling components to build equipment.
Additionally, revision and updation was an uphill task on 2D. Visualisation
of new products under development was not possible as product simulation features
were not available on the platform and it was not possible for us to view a
project holistically.
From 2D to 3D
|
By moving from 2D to 3D, there
are fewer design errors while developing detailed, production-ready designs.
We are able to store and manage all designs from a central location that
can be accessed by our design teams
|
We needed a solution that would allow us to communicate and manage design data,
enable faster production and optimise workflow so that we could finish designs
faster. We also needed software that would eliminate error-related reworking.
Keeping all these issues in mind, we looked for a solution that would improve
our productivity and embarked upon a program to upgrade our design facilities.
The aim was to speed up design cycles and deploy a system that would help us
incorporate changes in a drawing sequence from a single location. A change is
reflected in all the drawing sequences in a 3D environment, helping shorten
the design cycle.
We decided to choose Autodesk Inventor 3D as we had been using the companys
AutoCAD product for many years. That said, we did evaluate other products such
as PTCs Pro/E, CATIA and HiCAD but found Inventor 3D to be best suited
for our requirements. By turning to Autodesk, we have protected our investment
in 2D drawings and the knowledge developed in AutoCAD even as we made the transition
to 3D. Design engineers are now able to explore design options, easily update
design files, and automate previously manual tasks.
By moving from 2D to 3D, engineers are reducing design errors while developing
detailed, production-ready designs. We are now able to store and manage all
designs from a central location that can be accessed by our design teams.
The software has a low TCO and is easy to learn and use. Many users learned
the software on the job as we had a majority of the users on AutoCAD and migration
from it to Inventor 3D went smoothly.
To begin with, we took two licences of Inventor 3D in order to evaluate the
product for a year. The shift from the 2D environment to 3D was a gradual one,
as our people were not trained on the 3D platform. We have decided that all
new product development will be done on Inventor 3D. The switchover is complete
and we are currently using nine user licenses of Inventor 3D. The implementation
was completed in August 2005 and our design engineers were thoroughly trained
on the new platform.
- The project completion time has dramatically
reduced as the changes can be incorporated in a design sequence almost
immediately.
- Better visualisation gives a better idea of
how the plant will look upon completion.
- Better modelling capabilities.
- Human error is minimal as changes are immediately
reflected in the other drawing sequences of a project.
|
Where 3D scores
Autodesk Inventor helps create 3D equipment and piping layouts. We have even
designed some plants completely using Inventor. The project completion time
has reduced dramatically as changes can be incorporated in a design sequence
almost immediately and there is ease of visualisation for plants at the design
stage. We can also check the interface of pipes thoroughly in a virtual environment
using the 3D platform, which was not possible earlier. With its virtual modelling
capabilities, a user doesnt need to waste time interpreting plans. We
are now delivering the final product in less time.
In a new project, incorporating change takes only about one or two daysan
improvement from the earlier five days. This has helped us significantly improve
our productivity and modelling capabilities. It is also easier to understand
the project as to how the plant will look after the project is completed and
the superior visualisation makes it easy for us to give product demos. All this
has also led to better product and project quality.
Human error is almost nil in a 3D environment as the changes are reflected immediately
and if changes are incorporated in a single design they are automatically propagated
to other designs in a project.
|