|
IT Managers checklist
An IT security managers checklist
IT security managers have to undertake a series of exercises
to identify, prioritise and address risks affecting their organisations
sensitive information, writes R Sundar.
R Sundar
|
An organisation should address the aspect of controlling and
securing its information assets with an integrated and tangible index of service
offerings. A fully integrated security architecture provides a framework for
the application of a consistent and unified approach by which an organisations
IT security manager can develop and improve information security within the
said organisations business operations.
Ideally, the security set-up should be driven by business requirements or objectives
as reflected in the managements expectations for security. In practice,
this is influenced by the technical, legal and regulatory environment in which
an organisation functions. Considering the myriad factors that influence the
security requirements of an organisation, an IT security manager has to undertake
a series of exercises to identify, prioritise and address risks affecting an
organisations sensitive information.
Principles and policies
Several underlying themes dictated by the organisations business requirements
and its operating environment drive the development of an organisations
security principles. For instance, in an operational environment to be competitive
in the market, a bank may extend access to its core financial systems through
an Internet banking channel to offer 24x7 services to customers. Thus, one of
the security principles for this bank would be to comply with the Internet banking
services guidelines of the RBI. Security policies are founded on and flow from
security principles. For instance, a banks security policy may state that
access to sensitive information and systems will be restricted to authorised
personnel only and any such access will be logged and the logs will be periodically
reviewed for anomalous entries.
Principles and policies serve as the drivers of an organisations security
initiatives. In the above example, to determine what constitutes sensitive information,
an information classification exercise becomes necessary. Moreover, security
policy also serves as a baseline that influences the acquisition and configuration
of the system and security software and devices that are required to enforce
the organisations security requirements in order to ensure compliance
with policies.
Corporate security policies and standards are the cornerstones of an integrated
security architecture. Policies and processes linking financial, legal and business
requirements ensure the alignment of an organisations security investments
with its perceived business risks. Organisations should develop policies and
standards to ensure that business imperatives as well as legal and financial
obligations are met and employee awareness is created.
Information classification
To protect an organisations information assets, the IT security manager
must have sufficient knowledge of the business processes and the underlying
applications supported by the same. The IT security manager should have access
to a variety of technologies and asset identification methodologies to identify
organisational assets and document the business processes that they support
and to assist in preparing an inventory of assets which allows to understand
the breadth of the organisations systems, networks, applications and information.
It is imperative that the security initiative focusses on the information that
needs to be protected and be agnostic as far as the multitude of forms in which
the same information manifests itself. For example, if an employee can effectively
eavesdrop on a VoIP conversation involving the CFO, confidentiality is defeated.
The type and extent of security required is ultimately dependent on the information
to be protected and, therefore, classifying information and building an asset
inventory that stores or handles information is a natural starting point for
such an exercise. Business process owners know best when it comes to gauging
the importance of information and hence should be involved to a great extent
in any information classification exercise. The objective is to determine the
security requirements of the information which can be done by considering the
impact to the business if confidentiality and integrity are lost or it becomes
unavailable. Since the prime focus is on information and not on the IT infrastructure,
making an inventory of assets should not be restricted to prominent information
sources and sinks alone. Assets that handle the information such as printers
and VoIP equipment should also be taken into consideration.
Risk assessment
A formal risk assessment should be carried out to determine the level of security
needed to support a specific business process or initiative. The IT security
manager should identify the risks that impact an organisations ability
to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of its critical information
assets and the development of a structured information classification model.
Once the important information has been identified, and it is known as to why
the said information is important and which information assets handle it, the
next step is to determine the risk that such information is exposed to. Risk
is exemplified by a combination of threats. In any organisation, there may be
entitiescurrent and past employees, competitors, script kiddies, or seasoned
crackerswho would be interested in enjoying greater access to its information
resources than they have a legitimately right to. These entities, along with
natural forces that may unintentionally affect the security of sensitive information,
constitute threats. However, a threat ceases to represent a risk when there
are no vulnerabilities to exercise. Vulnerabilities represent weaknesses that
can be accidentally triggered or intentionally exploited. Risk assessment necessitates
the undertaking of a comprehensive evaluation of threats and vulnerabilities
that can affect an organisations information assets.
Threats and vulnerabilities analysis
Vulnerability
analysis focusses on technical and non-technical weaknesses affecting information
assets. It does not make a distinction between those that can be easily exploited
and those that probably may never be exercised. In order to derive significant
meaning, vulnerability analysis must be correlated with potential threats. A
vulnerability may not be actively exploited because of the considerable capability
required on the part of the exploiter. Thus the likelihood of exploitation of
a vulnerability is typically determined by its popularity and the simplicity
with which it can be exercised. Coupled with the business impact of the weakness,
the likelihood of its exploitation determines the risk that the information
asset is exposed to owing to that weakness. This explains why the risk posed
by a weakness differs depending on the source of the threat.
Risk mitigation
Once the IT security manager has the knowledge of the risks to which critical
information assets are exposed to, the obvious action to be taken is to introduce
additional controls to mitigate the said risks. The objective is to reduce the
residual risk to acceptable levels with a minimal reduction in other system
capabilities. This can be done by eliminating the threat or the weakness or
both, by restricting the impact of the weakness, or by implementing methods
to detect the exploitation of the weakness and take appropriate action. Risk
mitigation refers to prioritising, implementing and maintaining the appropriate
risk-reducing measures. Prioritisation is based on the risk quantified in the
risk assessment phase based on likelihood assessment and impact analysis. Implementation
may involve acquisition and deployment of devices and applications from various
vendors suitably supplemented with administrative measures.
Security architecture
This constitutes the comprehensive arrangement of various security components
within the context of the operational infrastructure for protecting critical
information assets; detecting and responding to security breaches or attempts
at such breaches. Ideally, a security architecture should adopt a defence-in-depth
approach addressing security at network, server, application, data and human
levels.
Infrastructure and security components that constitute an architecture must
be deployed by adhering to technology specific Minimum Baseline Security Standards
(MBSS). MBSS define the system configuration values that must be set on the
installed components. These could be defined either by the organisation for
each operating system, device and application or they could be adopted from
the standards recommended by vendors and organisations like National Security
Agency (NSA), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) or Center
for Internet Security.
Drafting comprehensive procedures
|
If an employee can effectively
eavesdrop on a VoIP conversation involving the CFO, confidentiality is
defeated. The type and extent of security required ultimately depends
on the information that has to be protected
|
Once the basic infrastructure security components are implemented,
standard operating procedure should be developed to ensure effective and efficient
operations as well as to enable adherence to the organisations information
security policies. Procedures are typically developed for managing identities,
provisioning access, backup and restoration, monitoring of security incidents,
incidence management, periodic assessment, patch management and configuration
change management.
The weakest link
It is well known that security is often breached by exploiting the weakest link.
More often than not, this weakest link is the user. In many organisations, the
user population is predominantly non-technical and is unaware of the significance
of information security and the risks posed to information assets. As a result,
an attacker need not even be technically competent to leverage the ignorance
of the user population as he or she could easily resort to social engineering
attacks to gain the necessary system information. Hence, it is advisable to
periodically conduct security awareness programmes and educate users of the
security measures put in place and their role and responsibility in ensuring
the security of the organisations information assets. Further, all new
hires who use information resources or who have access to areas where information
resources reside, must also receive formal security awareness training at the
earliest.
Periodic security audits
Security is not a one time activity, it is an ongoing process. New vulnerabilities
affecting infrastructure components and system applications are discovered almost
on a daily basis, thereby requiring continuous efforts on the part of the security
team to stay up-to-date with the latest sets of patches. Further, as business
requirements constantly change, existing system configuration may undergo modifications
and new components and applications may be introduced to meet additional business
demands. These changes and new introductions may also introduce vulnerabilities
that were hitherto non-existent. Consequently, periodic audit of information
systems must be carried out either by a team of internal experts or by a competent
external party.
The primary advantage of an architectural approach to information security is
the alignment of an organisations investment in security with its perceived
business risks. As speed to market is critical, organisations should optimise
their effectiveness in emerging market conditions without the issues of security
impacting either their market or business initiatives. With this approach, organisations
are able to maximise their investments and know that their vital resources are
secured and protected.
The security architecture process enhances competitive advantage
by enabling the IT infrastructure to securely meet critical business objectives.
Implementing a security architecture not only helps organisations address security
issues, but also drives greater efficiencies and permits greater reliance on
systems and controls in place.
The author is Associate Director, Ernst & Young. He
can be reached at r.sundar@in.ey.com
|