|
Soft Skills
Employee engagement is the key
With something like 69 percent of all employees not being
really engaged with their organisation, much can be achieved by
making effort to switch this group on, writes Stephen Manallack.
Are we finally reaching the point in the information revolution where there
is greater acceptance that people make the difference, that human capital is
more important than anything else?
Indian businesses and organisations feel the heat from global markets and intense
competition, as customers and shareholders become more demanding. Increasingly,
it is to their people (not just technology) that they have to turn for answers.
Leaders around the business world are under pressure for results. Everyone around
them is demanding better, faster and cheaper. And as leaders turn
to their employees, they find that loyalty has been replaced by a free market
where employees perform on conditional basis (am I acknowledged, what do I know,
will I be rewarded, is it worth it) rather than as a matter of course.
Everyday these employees make the choice to either engage or not engage their
talents in serving customers and the organisation. Yet, many organisations regard
employees as interchangeable units of cost.
The challenge is to switch these employees on by informing and motivating, and
many in management are not up to it.
The jury is not out on the question of the power of engagement of employees.
The data shows engagement creates more sales, more market value, higher return
on capital. Moreover, it shows reduced absenteeism, fewer accidents, greater
customer loyalty and retention. These are all direct drivers of profit and success.
The Gallup Organisation, over at least two decades of research in the USA, has
found that as many as 69 percent of employees are not engaged, that
only 16 percent are engaged. The latter group drives organisational success.
The vast majority that falls in the former category drags the performance down.
This sends a signal to the rest of the world, including India: check the motivation
of your people and do more to switch them on (engagement).
The good news is that most people see their workplace as full of potential;
they want to learn and make a worthwhile contribution. They also want recognition
for the same. Most importantly, people want face-to-face communication, so they
can better understand their place in the organisation.
Who is going to provide the drive for more and more employees to switch to be
engaged? How do you motivate people to make the right decisions for customers
and the organisation, and how do you unlock the discretionary effort that the
not engaged might withhold?
We have real trouble with this, where some seek charismatic leaders at the top
while others pursue teamwork or lets restructure as a way
to switch people on.
We know from research in a variety of companies exactly what are the communication
needs of employees; things like timely and accurate information, feedback, real
communication, coaching, a feeling of being valued, understanding of the business
and real human contact.
And if you think about how employees move to greater loyalty and engagement,
it is typically a shift from the personal (I) to a sense of team (We).
Leaders at all levels are obviously the critical link, rather than just the
one at the top. Leaders include managers, supervisors and team leaders.
In the day-to-day schedule of the workplace, they are the ones who win or lose
discretionary effort and engagement.
Unfortunately, in the US and many countries such as India, most of these leaders,
despite their best efforts, have never been trained in communication and have
little understanding of it.
We all pay lip service to how vital communication is; but more often
than not, among business leaders communication is poorly understood and badly
executed. Many of the people who gain promotion to management are not chosen
because they have outstanding communication skills; they are chosen because
of professional expertise or simply for being good at their job.
On the employees side, a major problem is the sheer volume of information
they receive, meaning that they often do not know what to do with it and what
it all means. This is the result of communicating without knowing where it will
lead to. In contrast, strategic communication is the reverse of this chaotic
approach: it brings focus and understanding.
Research has shown that what employees are really looking for is communication
that helps them do their jobs well. They also mostly say that they prefer to
get this kind of information from their managers, supervisors and team leaders.
So the challenge is how to unlock the power of this opportunity.
There are six imperatives for those who seek to use communication as part of
real leadership.
Make the time
To say you dont have time to communicate is to say you dont have
time to lead. This communication is more than a few memos, e-mails and meetings.
It is vastly more than my door is always open.
A good leader needs a strategy to shape his communication, and then the ability
to see it through. Time, persistence and repetition are essential ingredients
of good communication.
The right information
Naturally employees want to know how information and news relates to them. However,
mostly they get swags of information and no help in differentiating it. Information
overload and communication failure are team-mates. A discussion of developments
within your company or organisation should include what the changes mean to
your team and their customers. Your people want to know the why
of things that happen, because with the why they can become engaged.
Dont wait to communicate
A massive leadership problem is secrecy. We are not comfortable as leaders if
we do not have all the answers, so we wait until it is too late. The result
is always rumour, gossip and declining engagement. For many, the first step
to good leadership is a public acknowledgement that you dont know everything.
Being comfortable with not having all the answers provides real integrity to
your messages. So tell them what you know, tell them what you dont know
and tell them when you should know more.
Be open and honest
People have great inbuilt lie detectors. Nothing switches people off quicker
than a lie, it also extends to gossip and talking big, a failing
of those managers who desperately want to impress and think that if I
am a leader I should know everything and be in everything. Much better
instead to communicate in a real, open and human way.
What you say should match what you do. Words without
matching action are worse than no words at all. You cannot be a leader if you
cannot lead by example. Actions speak louder than words. For example, if you
promise to do something by a set time, always deliver. At the least, if you
cannot deliver explain what has changed and therefore it cannot happen as expectedit
is worth going out of your way to get this understood. Failure to live up to
your promises is a signal to others that they dont need to either.
Employees are not dummies
Listen to employees. Make it a real two-way communication. In most organisations,
there are ordinary employees who have already identified the problem and know
how to solve it. Ask them and encourage them to be forthright, even where there
may be disagreement; communication has the goal of understanding.
Organisations spend a fortune on measuring customer satisfaction and trying
to find out what they want and need, yet few have a clear idea of the communication
needs of their employees.
We know the stages that an employee goes through from the initial Whats
my job? to the fully engaged and switched on employee who asks How
can I help?
With planning and the right strategy, Indias managers, supervisors and
team leaders can communicate so successfully that more and more employees move
over into the engaged categorythen India would have a real competitive
advantage.
Stephen Manallack, a communication consultant, professional
speaker and trainer, is the author of You Can Communicate.
E-mail: stephen@manallack.com.au
|