|
Vendor Accent
Storage with intelligence
Storage
virtualisation is the latest tech industry catchphrase, especially with the
increased acceptance of storage networks, says Ajaz Munsiff in part one
of this two-part series
Expectations are being created around universal management of multi-vendor
storage and various other promises to provide the answers to all of todays
storage challenges. There has been a lot of confusion, debate and rushed-to-market
solutions with many companies trying to jump on the bandwagon, or at least not
get left behind.
The buzz in the industry is justified as virtualisation has a number of potential
benefits. Virtualisation greatly enhances the capabilities of storage administrators,
whose ability to manage storage with a comprehensive virtualisation and storage
services toolset significantly drives down storage administration costs. A storage
virtualisation solution eases the task and cost of storage capacity planning.
It allows usage of heterogeneous storage, empowering enterprises to leverage
their current infrastructure and to make future purchases based on the best
choices available rather than being tied to homogeneous proprietary storage
offerings.
Virtualisation makes the implementation of enterprise-wide storage management
a dream come true. It can provide enterprise-wide manageability, allowing storage
systems to be constantly available and scalable to meet future needs. It allows
easy storage space reallocation with minimal impact to application servers,
diminishing downtime and allowing enterprises to do business at optimum intensity,
24x7. Virtualisation is also fundamental to enabling business continuity functionality,
such as mirroring and remote backup. With proper implementation, storage virtualisation
can yield tremendous cost savings and other vital benefits to todays enterprises.
Search for proven solutions
Customers are seeking proven solutions for better utilisation of disk resources,
high availability and disaster recovery, snapshot and replication for rapid
recovery and the central management of storage.
Point solutions exist for many of the above storage demands, but customers are
increasingly under pressure to consolidate management and applications to save
time and money. This consolidation, not just of storage itself, but also of
storage management and applications, is what is really driving the new storage
market.
However, virtualisation isnt for every storage environment.
To figure out whether its a good fit for a particular organisation, the
organisation will have to understand the various types of storage intelligence
and where they exist in the networkon appliances, routers, gateways or
switchesand determine which implementation approach best suits their needs.
Then the organisation could proceed with questions for specific vendors. Corporations
seeking to consolidate and manage storage must consider the underlying implementation
of a virtualisation product, and how disruptiveor non-disruptiveit
is to their environment. They must ask the difficult questions.
Questions to ask
What are my business needs?
The real challenge in setting selection criteria is figuring out what an enterprises
business-specific needs are. Factors such as bandwidth, response time, and required
physical connections must be determined. Available support staff and technical
competency also play critical roles. At the same time, many companies are struggling
to disentangle themselves from proprietary vendor specific environments, IT
professionals have realised that true virtualisation enables the recognition
and control of storage devices from different vendors.
Is the technology flexible?
Since one-size-never-fits-all in enterprise storage, a virtualisation solution
should be flexible enough to handle SQL, Oracle, Exchange, SAP and a multitude
of other data sets and network configurations.
Does it deliver real value?
Virtualisation alone gives you nothing more than volume management and disk
sharing. Does the platform provide a solution for snapshot, replication and
mirroring? Does it lend itself to central management and control?
Is it scalable over the long term?
What can virtualisation can do for one application on one network segment may
be significant, but can the enterprise leverage the technology across the entire
network and all storage? What is the true cost of going from a pilot programme
to a full-blown enterprise-wide solution? Does it accommodate future technologies
and applications easily? What impact will it have on network performance? Will
it accommodate growth in storage and provide the best possible platform for
continued disaster recovery and business continuity for the majority of the
enterprise applications?
Business continuity is spreading its wings. The trend toward Information Lifecycle
Management (ILM) has helped companies realise that it is not just their core
business data that should be protected by disaster recovery implementations.
E-mail, document processing, customer response management and other mid-level
applications are increasingly recognised as mission-critical within the organisation
and, therefore, are candidates for DR and business continuity processes.
What should it do?
There are also some key challenges of storage virtualisation
which need to be addressed to avail the benefits. In terms of scale, since virtualisation
technology aggregates multiple devices it must scale in performance to support
the combined environment. In functionality, it masks existing storage functionality,
therefore it must provide required functions, or enable existing functions.
In terms of management, it introduces a new layer which must be integrated with
existing storage management tools. Lastly, on the issue of support, it adds
new complexity into the storage network, hence requires vendors to perform additional
interoperability tests.
| Non-disruptive |
Such solutions should be easy to integrate
into existing storage infrastructure, causing minimal pain, headaches, or
heartbreak |
| No effect on data integrity |
Enhancing information value is not possible if its
integrity is compromised |
| Allows access |
To array processes and functions. Solutions that
require customers to deploy proprietary applications or specialised interfaces
should be considered carefully or avoided entirely |
| Highly scalable or extensible |
To allow for future expansion of SAN or other storage
infrastructure components |
| Little or no added latency |
No one needs a solution that benefits one element
of storage performance at the expense of another |
| Plays well with others |
Existing management tools and applications, that
is. The best solutions require few, if any, new or proprietary additions |
| Lowers investment in human resources |
Reduces managerial and administrative overhead |
| Ease of management |
Allows easy, effective management of storage network
and devices |
| Open |
Supports multiple options and does not force customers
into single vendor relationships; should comply with standards |
|
Source: EMC
|
The author is Product Marketing Director, EMC South Asia.
He can be reached at Munsiff_Ajaz@emc.com
|