|
ACT accelerates clinical trials
Pharmaceutical companies spend 37 percent of their R&D
budgets on speeding up clinical trials. A large part (30 percent) is outsourced
to Clinical Research Organisations (CROs) who are looking at solutions that
help automate the clinical trial process. Getting a new drug to market can cost
as much as $500 million and take up to 15 years. Nearly half that time is spent
on clinical trials. This is an area that is ripe for e-business applications.
Asian Clinical Trials (ACT) a Hyderabad-based Clinical Research Organisation
popularly known as ACT has a large complement of experienced and well qualified
research professionals representing a wide range of therapeutic areas and research
functions. ACT has successfully conducted or collaborated, on significant research
trials, with pharmaceutical and biotechnology sponsors and major CROs of the
USA, UK, and India.
Out with the manual system
One of the key challenges for ACT was to manage and automate
thousands of clinical trial processes of testing and reporting on safety administered
by the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA). As per FDA regulations a computer
generated, time-stamped audit trail of operator entries and actions that create,
modify and delete records has to be maintained. Secondly, US pharmaceutical
customers want their CROs to use a system, which is in compliance with 21 CRF
Part II as laid down by the FDA.
The legacy system used by ACT did not have some key features to eliminate or
catch errors during the data entry process. ACT had to manually take printouts
and cross check with CRF pages. After the validation of software, query resolutions
(mistakes or errors and certain queries which were in the CRF pages) had to
be generated manually in Word. Data was then exported to an Excel sheet that
was not secure.
A pre-fab solution
ACT did two trials before finalising on Oracle Clinical.
There were two distinct advantages of using Oracle Clinical over other packages.
Sunder says, "Local support is very crucial for our kind of business. We
cannot afford to delay delivery as it will cost millions for our customers.
Not many vendors have local support available in India and in many cases people
have to come from outside India for resolving problems. Then there were problems
with integrating a database with the application. Oracle Clinical comes with
a database." In all one project used to take eight months to Execute. With
Oracle Clinical 4.5.0.0 the mistakes are automatically tracked with double data
entry. "This automatically creates a log of activities within Oracle Clinical.
On getting a Response from the investigators, we close the query resolution
file within Oracle Clinical after updating the data," says Sunder. Oracle
Clinical has multiple levels of security, which ensures that a data entry person
cannot change the data; a person resolving Queries cannot view data for which
he does not have authorisation. A reviewer need not change the data and also
create a complete log of activities right from the beginning of the study till
the job is completed as logging is automatic.
Mission accomplished
In mid-February 2004 ACT raised a purchase order for Oracle
Clinical. Infosys was engaged for implementing it [Oracle Clinical 4.5.0.3 Version]
and the company trained ten people from ACT on Oracle Clinical and the process
was completed in early March 2004. ACT went live with Oracle Clinical on 12th
March 2004. A Dermatology project undertaken post-implementation of 6800 CRF
pages (680 patients with 10 pages per patient) got executed in 18 days flat.
The time taken for building the fully validated database using Oracle Clinical
took about nine days and the double data Entry process took another nine working
days.
Revving up
After implementing Oracle Clinical, the CRFs were built using Oracle Clinical
at the time that the database was built and all security levels were set up.
The software takes care of setting the security levels. The event log is generated
by Oracle Clinical and the audit trail helps verify system integrity. Sunder
says, "Prior to the Oracle Clinical implementation we have executed three
projects [involving data management] in two years. Post implementation [Oracle
Clinical] we have done three projects in four months. This is the Return-on-Investment."
| Hardware |
Dell PowerEdge 1600SC
Xeon server with single CPU
with 140 GB HDD, 2 GB
RAM with RAID 5 |
| Application software |
Oracle Clinical 4.5.0.3 Version |
| Operating systems |
Windows 2000 advanced server |
| Data base |
Oracle_9i |
| User license |
05 |
|