|
IT project implementation in the enterprise
I
am often asked to talk about IT project implementation at the enterprise
level. If I could put down every view I have, within a few months
it would probably develop into a pretty useful book. But people
like me do not know how to write a book, thoughI reckonwe
can write reports and give short talks. I plan to share these thoughts
with you readers. Today I will touch upon five aspects of implementing
large IT projects (ERP, SCM, CRM, etc).
Managing disagreements
& dissent
One of the golden IT project implementation rules reads: There
should not be any public criticism of the ERP project by the team
members and the higher-ups. Here public means
any person other than the next one above in the chain of command.
If any member has any difference of opinion on how things should
be done, he/she should send an e-mail to his/her superior or go
across and meet him/her. This discipline has to be followed right
down the line by each one; with feedback, ones job ends when
one has conveyed ones view to ones superior. Afterward,
whatever is the decision must be honoured in right earnest and carried
out. I do not mean by this that the issues should not be debated
at all, I am merely suggesting that this free and frank expression
of opinions be done privately rather than in a public forum.
Public dissent has a very detrimental effect
on people at all levels. It dampens enthusiasm and affects the morale
of those who are implementing and supporting the project; it increases
doubts in the minds of the so-called Doubting Thomases; and it provides
fuel to those who are opposing the project.
Organisations must remember that the ultimate
responsibility of implementing ERP, or for that matter any big IT
project, rests with the management alone. Vendors and implementation
partners of the vendors do not take responsibility for failures.
Only about 40 percent of organisations succeed in implementing ERP
solutions.
However, these companies derive so much benefit
that others get attracted to tread this path too.
Interaction with the
team
It is seen that most of the organisations that fail in implementing
ERP are organised in a way such that the ERP team works in an isolated
manner. This group in such companies adopts the attitude of being
enlightened and, knowingly or otherwise, members behave
like they are on the fast track. This is resented by the others,
and all support for them dries up. This also results in business
units not owning the solution offered. The environment within the
organisation is of us v/s themand thats
highly counterproductive.
Therefore, conscious efforts must be made to
draw out the users and ensure that the ownership of the solution
rests with them and not with the ERP implementation team. The team
should be perceived as the means to achieve the solution desired
and designed by the business units.
The ultimate objective of implementing the solution
is to create the new lifeline of the organisation. All must know,
accept, recognise and remember that once ERP is implemented the
older transaction processing system is killed.
Positioning the people
People often mistakenly believe that the implementation team must
not be disturbed during the project period. But if the work demands
that any person has to be shifted out because of exigencies of work,
that should definitely be done. During the time when the software
is being configured and fine-tuned there will be some people who
cannot cope with the demands of the work. These have to be isolated
and shifted out. While implementing the software in the field units
there will be people who will resent implementation. These too have
to be proactively identified and
tackled.
At the same time, the reservations and apprehensions
of people must be taken care of. Adequate training through a well-designed
course must be imparted to people. One must also recognise that
despite the best efforts and intentions, there would be some people
who may have to be shifted out. The problems arise partly because
different people take varying amounts of time to learn and do not
want to be seen in a bad light. One has to balance the opposite
demands of carrying people along and going along
with the people.
The end of batch-mode
This applies not only to computer systems but also to the general
way of working and thinking. Everyone in the organisation must realise
that with ERP they are no longer working in batch mode. It is not
that the data will be processed and made available only by the middle
of the following month, after which reports will be perused and
analysed and decisions will be taken. ERP/SCM/CRM solutions enable
24x7x365 access to information and reports.
Most reports would now be available daily and
decisions could be taken on them instantly. Once the system is implemented
completely, there is no need to send data and reports from the field
offices to the headquarters. The HQ would too have online access
to the data and would see all that is there to see and would accordingly
act and react instantly. Everyone must know, accept, recognise and
remember that the batch mode is dead forever once these projects
are implemented.
The technology
IT is a very specialised area and expert help must be taken where
needed. A number of new problems often surface just before or after
the rollout begins. One has to remember that information technology
changes the way work is done within an organisation. It also puts
a halt to a number of malpractices and takes away a number of undocumented,
discretionary powers exercised by different people in the organisation.
The IT projects (ERP, SCM, CRM, etc) are resented not only by groups
that are likely to lose in the power game but are also resented
by groups suffering from techno phobia and techno
stress. All these groups form a part of the white-collar mafia
of the organisation. Fighting this white-collar mafia is very difficult
because dealing with them requires an altogether different skill-set.
But that discussions for another day.
Harsh Kumar is Advisor—IT at Hindustan Petroleum.
He can be contacted at harshkumar@hpcl.co.in. The views expressed
herein are his own, and do not necessarily reflect those of the
organisation
|