|
The future of enterprise Instant Messaging
Enterprise
Instant Messaging (IM) is gaining popularity, as corporates begin
to buy into the benefits of using IM over e-mail or voice mail.
Dr Uday Shukla tells us how instant messaging makes the job easier
At a time when "the next big thing"
often turns out to be yesterday’s news or to go up in a puff of
smoke, instant messaging has a real future as a key component of
enterprise IT. But that future has to do with a great deal more
than express-lane e-mail: Instant Messaging has the potential to
revolutionise communication, data-sharing, and collaboration by
making these workplace activities significantly more productive.
Consider where enterprise IM is
right now: It’s growing at approximately 20 percent annually, and
is expected to be in use by 70 percent of all companies by the end
of this year. By 2005, it’s expected to surpass e-mail as the primary
online communication tool.
Research shows that this is happening
for a reason. At IBM, 77 percent of employees say that IM has changed
the way they communicate, lessening the time they must spend with
e-mail and voice-mail, on the phone, and in face-to-face communications.
More than 80 percent of IBM employees say that instant messaging
makes their job easier. Among IBM’s clients who have IM, more than
75 percent say that the technology makes them more productive.
Now, imagine the future of IM.
It will embrace "in-context" communications in which the
names of all the people involved in a document, piece of data, or
video file are attached to that work as live links. Thus, if you
have a question about the document, run your cursor over a name
to find out if the individual is online; if he or she is, just click
to send an instant query—and watch productivity skyrocket. This
"contextual collaboration" can be extended to partners,
suppliers, and key customers at the discretion of the enterprise.
What do we have to do to ensure
that enterprise Instant Messaging reaches its full potential? First,
we must understand that IM’s success is dependent upon three key
factors: interoperability, security, and community selection.
Interoperability—the capability
for people with different systems to communicate with one another—has
been a problem for consumer IM, mainly because those applications
are advertising-driven and thus need to be proprietary to create
value. This artificial restriction is contrary to IM’s network effect,
which dictates that its value increases as each additional user
is added to the network. Consumer Instant Messaging services are
swimming upstream against this fundamental principle.
It is therefore imperative that
enterprise Instant Messaging operates transparently and seamlessly,
no matter what software or operating system is being used, and that
open technology standards be applied as IM evolves. In this way,
each organisation’s adoption of Instant Messaging will add value
to the overall network—inside and outside the enterprise firewall.
Speaking of firewalls, security
is clearly a concern with IM, just as it is with e-mail. While more
companies are adding encryption to their Instant Messaging offerings
to boost security, encryption is just the tip of the iceberg. In
order to provide enhanced security, Instant Messaging systems must
authenticate users by confirming their identities based on a trusted
source such as a corporate directory, so that we always know that
the people we’re chatting with are really who they say they are.
Related to security is the idea
of community selection. Instant Messaging software must give the
enterprise the flexibility to choose the community of people who
will be included in the network. This may include anyone in a partner
organisation, certain customers, or key individuals at supplier
companies. Selectivity can greatly enhance security, but it must
be network-friendly and function easily and transparently.
In considering these key elements
of enterprise IM, two things stand out. First, this is all possible
from an IT perspective; there are no technological impediments preventing
Instant Messaging from reaching its full potential. Second, if there
are any obstacles, they will come from the IT industry’s failure
to agree upon the open standards necessary to make Instant Messaging
a success. The industry has made significant progress in applying
open standards to other IT applications. There is no doubt that
we can set aside partisanship in this area as well and work together
to build enterprise Instant Messaging technologies that will benefit
us all.
The author is director, IBM Software Labs, India.
He can be contacted at ushukla@in.ibm.com
|