|
Broadband
Is there a market for broadband in India?
Few IT sectors are as challenging as the Indian
broadband market. This market is perhaps the only one in India where
telecom giants, ISPs, cable operators, and even the Indian Railways
are fighting for the spoils amidst a bloodbath in the market. Srikanth
R P tells you where the Indian broadband market is headed
 |
| According to Kobita Desai,
most service providers are constrained by lack of funds and
have to depend upon access to customers through the incumbent's
network |
When the Internet was driving the PC boom
around two years ago, the mood of anyone associated with IT was
not only optimistic but ambitious—very ambitious. Among other sectors,
broadband Internet access to the home seemed the most lucrative
market because of the estimated numbers. With over 35 million Indian
households already possessing cable TV connections, players entering
the broadband race estimated that even if a portion of this segment
opted for a broadband connection the windfalls would be huge. Hypnotised
by the market potential, players of all hues—from utilities to ISPs
to cable operators—began a frantic race to wire up India with optic
fibre.
But after two years, there is not much talk
of broadband Internet access today. Except for a few successful
players most players who sunk in huge amounts of money have gone
bust. Some players have even turned around their plans for offering
broadband Internet access and have started offering their networks
to service the needs of telecom players.
Current scenario
The current scenario in India with respect
to broadband subscribers can at best be described as nascent and
unlikely to grow in a major way unless there is a huge reduction
in access costs and a rapid improvement in infrastructure.
Opines Ritesh Shanker, senior research
analyst, Frost & Sullivan, “The broadband access market in India
has not taken off as was expected earlier and is still in its infancy
as far as consumer uptake is concerned. It is a typical chicken
and egg story in terms of infrastructure and content. There are
still various issues to be solved, like the last mile infrastructure
problem and lack of content and applications. Additionally, options
available in the market were also not up to the mark, which has
contributed to the slow growth of the broadband access market in
India.”
The chicken and egg situation can be best
seen from the experiences of utilities that entered this space.
Many players sought the best commercial routes and went about installing
optic fibre networks worth crores after getting ‘market feedback’
that a particular area had a high literacy rate with good PC penetration.
But after installing the network, reality turned out to be very
different. The inhibitor was the high cost that the players tried
to recover from customers. This was a hopeless situation as customers
were not ready to pay high rates and at the same time the players
could not subsidise costs simply because they had invested huge
amounts in building their networks. In an effort to reduce costs,
players started downscaling bandwidth requirements. The result was
that in some cases customers began complaining that access speeds
were even slower than dial-up speeds.
Infrastructure in place
Though the current scenario with respect
to infrastructure does not support broadband applications, the scenario
can change with telecom players like BSNL investing in optic fibre
networks in a huge way. For example, BSNL is looking at scaling
its current optic fibre network from 1,50,000 route km to around
4,00,000 route km. Similarly, players like Power Grid, Indian Railways
and GAIL have plans to scale their optic fibre networks. (See
Box : Optic fibre networks). Though the networks will be primarily
used for servicing the needs of telecom players, analysts believe
that as the networks scale up with respect to bandwidth they would
be used to offer broadband Internet access and even applications
like video-on-demand and Internet TV.
Options
Broadband access can be offered through
the following routes: Cable, DSL, wireless and broadband satellite.
DSL
Among these technologies, DSL hold tremendous promise for a country
like India. DSL (Digital Subscriber Line) allows a service provider
to provide both voice and data on the same telephone line. This
means that one can effectively surf the Internet and receive a phone
call at the same time. Hence players like MTNL and BSNL can effectively
use their existing copper lines to deliver broadband Internet using
DSL. The last mile connectivity problem is also effectively negated
through this route.
Says Kobita Desai, senior analyst, Telecom
and Mobile, Gartner India, “Having access to the local loop is the
key to success. Almost 90 percent of the local loop belongs to the
incumbent BSNL or MTNL and success does not come easy. Most service
providers are constrained by lack of funds and have to depend upon
access to customers through the incumbent’s network. Alternatively,
service providers have to either work out commercial arrangements
that not only take a long time for approval but are also skewed
in favour of the incumbent. The other option is to deploy parallel
networks, which is a huge waste of resources. Few have the funds
or the resilience to roll out large broadband networks. Carriers
like Tata, Reliance, Bharti (because of their enterprise focus)
and BSNL (the PSU giant almost owns the local loop and it will take
a long while for others to achieve the same magnitude of scale)
are likely to dominate this space.” BSNL has already started offering
always-on Internet on an experimental basis in one city in each
telecom circle.
Cable
In a similar way, cable players who already have the reach and provide
cable TV services to millions of subscribers have the potential
to convert their existing subscribers to broadband Internet access
subscribers. Successful players in this space include In2Cable and
Hathway Cable Internet.
In2Cable has close to 30,000 users registered
for cable Internet. In addition to providing services like broadband
Internet access, cable players are also looking at providing value-added
services to differentiate themselves from the competition.
Says T M Sridharan, CEO, In2Cable India,
“To help our customers see value in our service offerings, we have
a CRM system wherein a customer can see his usage, his bills and
all other required information. Additionally, we are also providing
VOIP-based services and VPN services.” The other big cable player
in this space, Hathway, is also optimistic on the growth of the
market and is looking at launching a host of value-added services
to boost revenues.
Says a Hathway spokesperson, “We see applications
like real-time gaming and video content emerging in the coming year.
This will add to the attractiveness for broadband connections. We
have also launched VOIP services under the brand name, Net Talk.”
The success of both these players can be seen from the fact that
In2Cable has a presence in 8 cities across India while Hathway has
a presence across 6 cities.
Wireless
When the broadband race began, players who had the access to infrastructure
and reach supposedly had the edge over other players. But some players
like Sify have leapt over the rooftops with the help of wireless
technology. Sify for instance uses a wireless broadband technology
called Point-to-Multipoint technology that enables customers to
be connected using a wireless radio network. The strategy has paid
off in a big way as Sify has managed to sign up over 400 buildings
in Mumbai alone. Each building has a minimum of 20 customers, which
translates to 8,000 customers.
Says Rustom Irani, chief technology officer,
Sify, “We realised that broadband had not taken off in a big way
given the high cost and the task of laying cables to every building
to enable broadband delivery. The key lay in enabling the last mile
for delivery of broadband in such a way that it was acceptable to
everyone, quick to deploy and had a low cost of execution. This
is what we have been able to achieve with our hybrid technology.
In addition to making the service available in residential buildings
through our fixed wireless broadband access solution, we are tying
up with cable operators on a revenue sharing basis.” After its success
in Mumbai, Sify is now looking at taking Point-to-Multipoint technology
to Chennai, Delhi, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Pune, Chandigarh, Noida
and Gurgaon.
The technology gives Sify not only the
option to deploy a solution quickly, but more importantly, helps
the ISP do it cost effectively. All Point-to-Multipoint needs is
a hub to generate signals, which then fires signals in different
directions, and a receiver to receive the signals. Along with the
receiver, there is a multiplexer that then splits incoming signals
into smaller bandwidth signals, which is then delivered to the end-customer
through an Ethernet cable connection to the PC. So whenever Sify
signs on a new building, all it needs to do is to put a receiver
on the building and allocate bandwidth according to customer needs.
 |
| Issues like the last mile infrastructure
problem, lack of content and applications, and lack of options
available in the market have contributed to the slow growth
of the broadband access market in India, says ritesh shankar |
Satellite
VSATs have been traditionally used for providing connectivity to
remote places and in linking geographically dispersed locations.
The government’s decision to change the licensing model from a fixed
license fee to a revenue sharing model has seen a positive change
and given a fillip to the industry. This has resulted in players
offering more value-added services than just plain connectivity.
Says Partho Banerjee, president and
CEO, Hughes Escorts Communications, “Traditionally, we used to provide
satellite communications services with the help of VSATs. But recently
we have launched the DirecWay broadband platform in India that supports
a slew of applications like gaming, interactive education and training
and extended enterprise networks. By using the broadband medium,
companies can provide value-added services such as file broadcasting
and multimedia content delivery.” With prices falling, one can expect
VSATs to make a strong foray into niche applications like online
lotteries and telemedicine.
Key issues
Apart from the lack of customer volumes
that service providers need to subsidise rates, the cost of bandwidth
is also far higher than rates in international markets. And there
is definitely a fuzzy picture in the market with respect to bandwidth
availability. Some players say that the bandwidth available at their
disposal is much more than is utilised and some say that available
bandwidth is lower than demand.
Opines Rustom Irani of Sify, “It is not
the amount of bandwidth alone that is a concern, but the availability
of affordable bandwidth. Today, international bandwidth prices are
artificially high because of lack of open competition. Initially,
the i2i cable was proposed and would have drastically brought prices
down to around 20 percent of what was prevailing then. However,
this promise has not been realised and one wonders whether the amount
of bandwidth available in the country is being projected as low
to keep prices high. This is the simple demand outstrips supply
model, which cannot be true due to the 8 Terabit i2i cable now operational.”
To summarise, the lack of broadband subscribers
in India can be put down to a number of reasons. To begin with,
the Internet is still in its early development stage in India with
only 8 million users. Secondly, capacities on both domestic and
international bandwidth links currently in India is nowhere near
that of international carriers or that available in more developed
countries. Along with such capacities, content that is aimed at
broadband access also needs to be available. These include graphics-rich
news sites, video chats and online games. All these are not currently
available simply because demand does not exist.
Future
Most analysts that Express Computer
spoke to said that they believe telecom companies will dominate
the broadband access space by providing services through DSL to
their existing subscribers. One can even expect to see smart players
like Sify emerging in the broadband access market in a big way as
they have been able to negate the advantage of existing infrastructure
through wireless broadband services.
Service providers will also have to find
a balance between targeting the high volume (but low-value) consumer
space and the high-value corporate space.
Opines Desai of Gartner, “While the future
lies in targeting the consumer space, the enterprise market is the
first opportunity. Remote access/inter-office connectivity is likely
to be a dominant need. We also expect small offices and branch office
connectivity to fuel demand as it is a more cost-effective, high-speed
alternative to leased lines and ISDN.”
In addition to DSL, analysts like Frost
& Sullivan’s Ritesh Shanker believe that with the advent of
CAS (Conditional Access Systems), there will be much more investment
flowing into cable infrastructure, leading to better broadband access.
Optic Fibre
Networks: Summary of Rollout
| Domestic
long distance |
|
|
|
| BSNL |
400,000 |
3-Apr |
Planned
network is as per the perspective plan of BSNL for 2001-2010.
BSNL is likely to complete the network much earlier. |
| VSNL |
12,000 |
2003-04 |
Holds
the licence to offer DLD services. Would build the network with
a combination of build and buy strategy. In the first phase,
the DLD service would be launched in 6 cities, with the network
of 5,000 km. Will invest Rs 14 billion in next 4 years for DLD
services. |
| Indian
Railways |
35,300 |
2004-05 |
Setting
up OFC network in 4 phases, which are being carried out simultaneously.
The Tata Group and MTNL were interested to acquire equity stake
in Railtel. However, the company has yet to select a joint venture
partner. |
| Power
Grid |
14,000 |
2003-04 |
The link
between Delhi, Chandigarh and Jaipur has been commissioned.
The OFC link between Delhi and Mumbai will be commissioned later. |
| GAIL |
14,500 |
Q1 2003 |
Setting
up OFC network in 3 phases, with an investment of Rs 3 billion.
In May 2002, the company commenced the Delhi-Ahmedabad-Mumbai
link. It has signed agreements with Bharti Telesonic, Reliance,
Escotel Mobile and other telecom operators to lease its OFC
capacity. |
| Tata
Power Broadband |
3,000 |
Q1 2003 |
Plans
to invest Rs 3.3 billion in setting up broadband access network
in Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai and Pune. It has proposed to invest
Rs. 5.5 billion to interconnect these cities. In Mumbai, it
has completed the OFC network of 700 km. It has also completed
an OFC link between Mumbai-Pune. The access network in Delhi,
Chennai, Pune and Hyderabad is in progress. |
| Reliance
Infocomm |
60,000 |
Q1 2003 |
Proposed
an investment of Rs 70 billion to connect 115 cities covering
Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Karnataka,
Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa,
West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh and Delhi. |
| Bharti
Group |
25,000 |
Q1 2003 |
Proposed
to invest Rs 12 billion, till March 2003, in the DLD business.
Has laid 10,000 km of ducts and 6,670 km of OFC in states including
Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka. |
| Tata
Teleservices |
3,000 |
Q1 2003 |
Plans
to interconnect all district headquarters of Andhra Pradesh |
| Hughes
Telecom |
2,000 |
Q1 2003 |
Has launched
broadband access services using its 1,200 km OFC network in
Mumbai. Has launched its broadband services in 10 cities of
Maharashtra and Goa by April 2002, with an investment of Rs
35 billion. |
| ShyamTelelink |
3,300 |
2003-04 |
To carry
intra-circle long distance calls, it will create OFC links connecting
towns like Jaipur, Jodhpur, Alwar, Udaipur, Ajmer, Bhilwara,
etc. |
| HFCL
Infotel |
2,600 |
2003 |
Backbone
network to carry long distance calls and provide broadband services |
| Fascel |
2,000 |
2003 |
OFC link
between Ahmedabad and Rajkot is commissioned. Setting up OFC
link between Rajkot, Porbandar and Gandhidham |
| Other
broadband operators |
2,800 |
|
Network
mainly for broadband Internet access. |
Source: Nasscom
Internet
subscriber base projections
|
Internet subscribers (million) |
1.13 |
1.76 |
2.46 |
4.75 |
7.18 |
|
Growth rate (percent) |
|
80 |
90 |
90 |
80 |
|
Retail Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Subscribers (nos) |
0.62 |
1.02 |
1.5 |
2.18 |
3.07 |
|
Dial-up subscribers' share (%) |
98.4 |
97.9 |
95 |
90 |
85 |
|
Broadband (DSL/Cable) subscribers' share (%) |
1.6 |
2.1 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
|
Corporate Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Subscribers |
0.51 |
0.74 |
0.95 |
2.57 |
4.11 |
|
Dial-up subscribers share |
97.4 |
70.9 |
48.1 |
55.6 |
35.7 |
|
Broadband (DSL/Cable) subscribers' share (%) |
0.9 |
2 |
10 |
25 |
40 |
Source: Nasscom
|