|
After
shrinking by 4 percent last year, the server market stabilised
in H1 2002 to the extent that a contraction in the Intel space
was offset by modest growth in the UNIX segment. On the technology
front, IBM and HP rolled out dual processor blades. With Big
Blue releasing the 16-way x440, Intel boxes continued their
charge up the performance ladder, says Prashant L Rao
It
has been a tough year so far for server vendors. That said,
while things havent improved, they certainly havent
worsened from last year, which saw a dismal showing in servers.
In fact, many vendors believe that good tidings wait around
the corner, with Acer going as far as to predict a boom in
2003.
But the more things change the more they stay the same. In
the Indian server market, the leaders stayed the same: Sun
in UNIX and HP in Intel though IBM mounted a very strong assault
in the Intel space. The January-September period has seen
the market in a slump, with modest growth in the UNIX space
being offset by shrinkage in the Intel segment. H2 remains
a toss-up. IDC is predicting modest growth; HP is sceptical,
while IBM and Acer are optimistic.
 |
| Blades
are starting to pick up as the technology has been accepted,
says Vaibhav Phadnis |
The
Unix players
Sun: Top of the heap
Sun Microsystems continues to dominate the UNIX server market
in India. The company managed to increase its market share
from 37.8 percent in the first three-quarters of 2001 to 51.7
percent in 2002.
-
Strengths: Sun is building up on its traditional
backbone of SPARC-Solaris. The company released Solaris
9 this year. It is pushing the UltraSPARC III to 1200 MHz
shortly. The upcoming UltraSPARC IV will bring Sun on par
with IBM in processor technologyit will support two
processors on a single chip. The
companys mid-range offerings include the 3800, 4800
and 6800 servers. Top-of-the-line are the Sun Fire 12K and
15K. Last year, a couple of 15Ks had been installed two
weeks after the India launch. Today, there are 10 Sun Fire
15Ks in the country, each costing between $1 million and
$15 million. We sold eight Sun Fire 15Ks and one 12K
this year, says K P Unnikrishnan, country head, marketing,
Sun Microsystems India. Last
year saw the company come out with a coherent Linux strategy.
Sun Linux and the LX50 are Suns first steps towards
having a credible entry-level offering that can compete
with Wintel on price-performance.
-
Weaknesses: Though Sun took the first steps towards
competing in the Standard Intel Architecture Servers (SIAS)
space, it still has miles to go in this endeavour. Starting
Q1 2003, Sun will push the LX50 as a solution in a
box. In blades, Sun trails HP and IBM; while both
of its competitors have blades for sale, Sun has yet to
announce a launch date.
-
Opportunities: Now that it has a Linux distribution
and a good entry-level Lintel box, Sun can come out with
a slew of such offerings and make a dent in the SIAS segment.
Sun CEO Scott McNealys visit to India should help
the company galvanise support around its Sun ONE platform,
which in turn should help it drive solution
sales.
-
Threats: As we said last year, Wintel servers are
getting more powerful. Just how powerful can be seen by
IBMs launch of a 16-way Intel box that takes on Suns
lower-end SPARC servers. Sun needs to be quick in beefing
up its entry-level UNIX boxes and keeping them competitively
priced vis-à-vis top-of-the-line Intel servers.
HP:Destination
Itanium
No other vendor has quite the number of server lines that
HP has in the UNIX space: PA-RISC, Alpha, NonStop, Itanium;
the combined product range of HP and Compaq is extensive.
HPs long-term goal is to shift to Itanium, but as that
processor is not yet ready for prime-time the company is continuing
with existing lines in the medium-term. HPs share of
the UNIX server market for the first three quarters dropped
to 30.5 percent in YTD 2002 from 38.2 percent in YTD 2001.
-
Strengths: HP has a wide product line starting with
entry-level blades and scaling up to the Superdome. Its
long-term plans are clear: it will migrate to Itanium.
-
Weaknesses: Too much choice. HP has more technology/product
lines than any other major vendor. True, IBM has four server
lines, but only one of them is in the UNIX space, the pSeries.
HP has three of them powered by the PA-RISC, Alpha and Itanium
2.
-
Opportunities: HP is the only vendor betting the
shop on Itanium. If that chip takes off in 2003-04, HPs
fortunes will soar.
-
Threats: Existing product lines have had their lifecycles
expanded. Its still unclear when the shift to Itanium
will take place. Sun is taking advantage of the confusion
to build on its dominant position.
IBM:
SMEs in its sights
Globally, it has been a good year for IBM. The company is
the world leader in the server market for third quarter of
2002 as per IDC. In India however IBM is yet to replicate
that success in the UNIX space. As the year ends, IBM is getting
aggressive about taking on Sun and HP with a bunch of new
pSeries servers aimed at the SME segment. IBM is targeting
the 100-user SAP or Oracle environments with its 630 and p610
servers. The p630 starts at Rs 20 lakh. The p630 is
capable of running an entire companys applications with
2 or 4 CPUs, says Puneet Gupta, country manager, pSeries,
IBM India. In addition to the p630 server CDAC deal, IBM has
sold the p630 to 10 other customers. Surjit Chana, vice-president,
marketing operations, server group, IBM, says, We will
do whatever it takes to be number one in the Indian UNIX market
in 2003.
-
Strengths: Technology is IBMs biggest ace.
Here it has a generation lead on Sun with the Power 4 chip
offering two processors on a chip. Sun is still talking
about this for the upcoming UltraSPARC IV. In ERP implementations,
IBM claims to have the majority of the market with installations
at Tisco, Bajaj Auto and Hero Honda. Recently the company
won a big order from CDAC to set up a Linux cluster across
62 p630 servers.
-
Weaknesses: In the past, IBM has perhaps not been
as aggressive in marketing its UNIX boxes as its rivals.
That appears to be changing now with the company gunning
for Sun and HP.
-
Opportunities: If IBM can make its mid-market strategy
work and sell its p630 and 650 servers in big numbers to
this segment, it will help the company give HP a run for
the runner-up slot.
-
Threats: Sun is catching up in technology. Once the
UltraSPARC IV is out, IBMs processor advantage will
be lost.
 |
| IBM’s
share of the market is rising. In Q3, for the first time,
IBM beat HP in revenues and unit shipments, claims Jyothi
Satyanathan |
The
Intel players
HP:The winner
HP took the crown that was held by Compaq last year with a
37.2 percent share of the SIAS server segment in 2002.
-
Strengths: In keeping with its tradition of being
the first off the mark in adopting new technology, HP was
the first vendor to launch a Gallatin-based server, the
ML570 G2. HP was also the first vendor to launch blades
in India. Globally, HP leads in blades (53.9 percent), SIAS
(32.2 percent) and its lead extends to 2-way (34.3 percent),
4-way (40.8 percent) and 8-way servers (45.8 percent). In
the Linux-Intel segment HP has 28.7(percent) share by units
world-wide.
-
Weaknesses: Of late the company has been second in
a couple of announcements, notably the first Xeon blade
and the first 16-way Intel server. The company is working
on a 16-way server powered by Intels 64-bit Madison
that is expected by end-2003 and will run on both the UNIX
and Windows platforms. That puts HP in a catch-up position.
It needs to get back the mantle of being in the lead in
announcing new technology on the Intel platform.
-
Opportunities: The Proliant is perhaps the strongest
server brand around. HP is leveraging that to the hilt with
its performance parameter slot occupied by Proliant models.
HP will target a larger number of resellers than it has
in the past through the Proliant Gold Partner programme.
The other push is on blades; if HP hits the bulls-eye with
this one, it will have only IBM to contend with. Blades
are starting to pick up, the technology has been accepted,
says Vaibhav Phadnis, business manager, industry standard
servers, HP India. HP has started shipping 2P blades and
is in the process of conducting a feasibility study for
one of Indias largest banks to find out where blades
can have the maximum impact, in server consolidation (2P)
or in Web farms (1P). Solutions for server consolidation
built around VMware will be another focus area. HP is targeting
a 30 percent growth quarter-on-quarter in the Intel space.
-
Threats: Last year we had conjectured that Dell would
perhaps be the most likely contender for Compaqs crown.
In the end it was Big Blue that gave HP a run for its money
in the Intel space. While HP leads in the SIAS segment,
its share is down by 11 percent while IBMs is up by
6 percent. Worse (from HPs point of view), IBM has
beaten HP to the punch in launching a 16-way Intel server.
HPs own 16-way box will debut by end-2003 giving IBM
a years lead at the top of the Intel space.
IBM: eXtraordinary
For a company that has four server lines, three of which have
nothing to do with Intel, IBM was the wildcard entry. It executed
brilliantly to come out with dual-processor Xeon blades and
the first 16-way Intel server, the x440, with technology from
IBM Labs. IBMs share of the market is rising.
In Q3, for the first time, we beat HP in revenues and unit
shipments, says Jyothi Satyanathan, country manager,
xSeries & Intellistations, IBM India.
-
Strengths: IBM drew on technology from its mainframe
business to offer features like logical partitioning using
VMware to offer multiple OSs on a single Intel box. Its
16-way x440 can run as many as 128 OSs. The x440 is
hurting Sun at the entry level by taking on jobs considered
UNIX only, adds Satyanathan. In blades, IBM was second
to market but it made up for that by being the first in
launching Xeon blades.
-
Weaknesses: Right now IBM is very focused on the
Intel market, and it is hard to pinpoint a flaw in the companys
Intel strategy. In the past it was slow to adopt the latest
technology in this space, but thats no longer true.
-
Opportunities: If IBM can keep pushing up the performance
ladder with boxes that deliver entry to mid-range UNIX-class
performance on Intel hardware, it could start cannibalising
Suns market and expand the Intel market upwards. The
company is not resting on its laurels; it plans to set up
technology centres in Mumbai and Bangalore that will also
be marketing and demo centres where customers can bring
their applications, test them on IBM hardware, and then
make a purchase decision.
-
Threats: HP has aggressive plans for the Intel market.
Now that the Compaq-HP merger has been executed, expect
the company to work on regaining lost ground in 2003.
Acer: Anticipating recovery
Acer had a good year. In a shrinking market it managed to
repeat last years performance and grow its market share.
-
Strengths: Last year the company made a transition
to Tualatin. This year it shifted to Xeon processors for
all dual processor and higher servers. The company is marketing
storage solutions to supplement its four-way box deals as
it has found that customers buying four-way look for a cluster
plus a DAS/SAN solution. SAN was a factor in 10 percent
of our deals, significantly up from last year, says
Sam Oommen Thomas, senior product marketing manager, Acer
India. The
company has started looking at EOUs, corporates and the
BFSI segment. While Acer has traditionally sold desktops
and notebooks to software houses, it is just starting to
pitch servers to this segment. The company also launched
a 2U Xeon rack server aimed at the ISP/ASP market. It plans
to come out with more models in the rack space.
-
Weaknesses: Acer does not have any products at the
very high-end and it lacks an 8-way box.
-
Opportunities: In the next 6-12 months the focus
will be on pushing storage to existing clients as well as
new customers. Storage will be big business in 2003. Lots
of organisations have a critical mass of servers and they
are looking at more sophisticated storage offerings. Storage
is also an important part of CRM, says Thomas.
-
Threats: As the SIAS market moves up the performance
ladder, Acer will be left behind unless it addresses its
lack of high-end servers.
At the end of the tunnel
Going forward, the Intel space will see intense competition
between HP and IBM. In the UNIX space, Sun will have its work
cut out if it wants to replicate its smashing performance
of 2002. Technology waits for no vendor, Intel machines get
better every year, and who knows, 2003 might well see Itanium
finally entering the mainstream.
| Technology
trends in the server market |
- Two
for the price of one
There is a move towards having two
or more processors on a single chip. IBM has been
the first off the mark; this technology exists in
the Power 4 with 175 million transistors and two processors.
Now Sun is introducing similar technology with the
upcoming UltraSPARC IV. In fact, with the UltraSPARC
5, Sun intends to crank it up a notch and have four
cores on a single chip. Meanwhile, Intel introduced
hyperthreading in its Xeon line. Its not quite
the same thing; hyperthreading lets a single processor
execute two separate codes concurrently, making it
appear that there are two processors at work to the
software. Initial performance gain estimates of up
to 30 percent have been touted.
-
Grid computing
Everybodys talking about grids.
The idea is simple enough, to tap unutilised server
capacity by pooling computing power into a grid. IBM
is going as far as to talk about serving up compute
cycles as a utility much as you plug an appliance
into a wall socket for electricity. In future you
should be able to plug a smart appliance or computer
into a wall socket and obtain compute cycles.
-
Virtual servers
Every server vendor with a high-end
box has some version of this. Both IBM and HP are
building solutions around VMware. The end result in
all these cases is to allow businesses to run multiple
OSs on a single box. In IBMs case this stretches
to the extent of PCs seemingly logging into multiple
servers while in reality these are just logical partitions
on a single box.
-
Blades
Both HP and IBM have dual-processor
blades in the market. This technology concentrates
a greater number of servers into a smaller space than
ever before. For instance, IBMs Xeon blades
allow for 84 of them to be stacked into a single rack.
Blades are a natural evolution from rack mounts. These
have proved very popular in data centres and in any
environment where space is at a premium.
-
DDR SDRAM
DDR SDRAM is the new memory standard.
For a while it looked as if RDRAM would be the next
big thing, but in the end DDR won out. The technology
first gained popularity in 3D graphics cards starting
with NVIDIA whose GeForce 3D chip worked with ÝR
SDRAM. It took a while for DDR to become a standard
for main memory, largely due to Intels support
for RDRAM at that point of time. Today, Intel has
also joined the DDR bandwagon. DDR runs at 200 or
266 MHz today, but efforts are on to push 400 MHz
DDR. If thats not enough, DDR II is in the works.
-
PCI-X
The technology for add-on cards has
changed. PCI has given way to PCI-X, an evolutionary
jump supporting Gigabit Ethernet, Fibre Channel, Ultra3
SCSI and SAN. The older PCI caused I/O bottlenecks.
These are a thing of the past with PCI-X that runs
at up to 133 MHz on a 64-bit bus while being backward
compatible with existing PCI cards.
|
| Hot
Iron—significant server debuts of 2002 |
- Sun
Fire 12K: The 12K plugged a hold in Suns
product line up where IBMs p690 servers were
unchallenged. Priced in the range of half a million
to a million dollars, the 12K does not come cheap.
It does, however run all the apps from the 15K.
- IBM
x440: This revolutionary 16-way Intel box scales
up using proprietary technology from IBM. Big Blue
now has a performance lead in the high-end SIAS market
that looks unlikely to be contested till HP launches
its 16-way box late next year.
- HP
Proliant ML570 G2: The first Gallatin box, this
HP server uses the new 2 GHz Xeon MP chip and it broke
the 100,000 tpmC barrier with an 8-processor industry-standard
SMP configuration.
- IBM
BladeCenter: The first Xeon blades, you can fit
84 of these dual 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon blades into a
6-foot rack. The amount of cable required to hook
up these servers is reduced by 83 percent due to its
design that promotes sharing of components integrated
into the rack.
|
|